Resources
Education + market intelligence
Blog, whitepapers, webinars and intelligence on regulation and trends in the end-of-life tyre industry.
Who is who in the sector
The map of end-of-life tyre management in Mexico
If you are new to this, these are the players you will run into. We have gathered the essentials on each one so you do not have to assemble the puzzle piece by piece.
Trade representation
National Chamber of the Rubber Industry (CNIH)
Collective management plan
Responsible Used Tyre Management Association (AMRLU)
Federal authority
SEMARNAT
Territorial management
Municipal and state governments
Regulatory framework
What the law requires, in plain language
Reference summary. It does not replace legal advice or reading the official text published in Mexico's Federal Official Gazette.
Federal standard
NOM-161-SEMARNAT-2011
Penalties
LGPGIR · article 112
Collective instrument
Waste Tyre Management Plan
Local standard
NADF-024-AMBT-2013
Before you buy the machine
Permits for an end-of-life tyre plant in Mexico
Almost everything published about opening an end-of-life tyre (ELT) plant is about the machine. The paperwork that decides whether the plant opens — and above all when — is almost never published. This is the map: what the law says, with article and date, and who authorises what.
What the law already says
LGPGIR · Article 19, section X
«Used tyres»
Since the reform published in Mexico’s official gazette on 4 June 2014, used tyres are their own category of special-handling waste. Before that they had to be inferred from the transport-services category. That change is what opens the door to everything else.
LGPGIR · Article 28, section III
«…as well as importers and distributors of used tyres, under the principles of recovery and shared responsibility»
The duty to draw up and run a Management Plan does not fall on the generator alone. By express wording it also falls on whoever imports and distributes. If you sell tyres, the law has already named you.
NOM-161-SEMARNAT-2011 · Normative annex
«Waste tyres»
They appear twice in the list of wastes subject to a Management Plan: under heading IV, waste from federal and public transport; and under VIII (c), end-of-life products generated by a large generator in quantities above 10 tonnes per waste stream per year. That threshold is what decides who is bound and who is not.
Who authorises what
This is where most of the time is lost, because intuition misleads: the authority that licenses your plant is not SEMARNAT.
The state
LGPGIR · Article 9, section III
The law gives the states the power to «authorise the integral management of special-handling waste». Each state publishes its own procedures and its own deadlines, and they do not resemble each other. In Hidalgo, for instance, they sit in the state’s single registry of procedures and services.
Aquí vive
Your operating authorisation, your generator registration and the approval of your Management Plan.
The municipality
LGPGIR · Article 10
Its legal mandate is urban solid waste, not special-handling waste. It does not license your plant — but without it there is no operation, and land use is the one item on this list that can render an already-purchased site useless.
Aquí vive
Compatible land use, operating licence and civil-protection sign-off.
The federal government
SEMARNAT · LGEEPA
It enters through three doors: when hazardous waste is involved, when the activity falls in a federally regulated sector — chemicals and hazardous-waste treatment among them — or when the works require federal environmental impact assessment.
Aquí vive
Single Environmental Licence, hazardous-waste authorisations and federal environmental impact assessment.
The layer almost nobody anticipates: pyrolysis
If the project is pyrolysis, the oil it produces falls under the petroleum-products regime, and that regime recently changed hands. The Hydrocarbons Sector Law, published on 18 March 2025, created the National Energy Commission (CNE), which absorbed the functions of the former CRE and CNH; its regulations were published on 3 October 2025. Permits already granted by the CRE stay valid until their term ends. Almost every guide circulating online still says «CRE».
Why the schedule falls apart
None of these procedures is hard on its own. The problem is different: they do not run in parallel. Several cannot even be filed until another one resolves, and that is written down nowhere — each authority publishes its own deadline, none publishes the chain. An ELT project accumulates filings across all three levels of government, and that is where the year goes, not at customs with the machine.
There is a second oversight, cheap to fix and expensive to discover late: your plant is a generator too. The steel, the fibre and the fines coming out of the process are waste, with their own registration and their own logbook. Being authorised to receive is not enough.
This map is public on purpose: we want the sector to understand it. The critical path — what enables what, what should be filed first and in which order — depends on the project and is not settled by reading a web page. There are environmental permitting firms that walk it with you, and some equipment makers that build it into the project. One of them publishes a free diagnostic that estimates how many filings apply to you and before which authorities.
See the permitting diagnostic →Legal framework · Latin America
Tyre law across the region’s 20 countries
ELTrack does not invent an obligation: it hangs off the ones that already exist. This is the regulatory map of the end-of-life tyre across the twenty countries of Latin America, with instrument and date.
Mexico
General Circular Economy Law
Official gazette · 19 January 2026
Who it binds
Producers and importers, through the Extended Producer Responsibility introduced by article 36.
The mechanism
The producer is environmentally responsible for its product across its life cycle, «under the Circular Management it registers with the Ministry». The law also creates a public Circular Economy Registry.
Who enforces
SEMARNAT. The regulations and the 2026-2030 National Programme are still in process; plastics are the first sector named.
LGPGIR (waste law)
Last amended · 19 January 2026
Who it binds
Large generators and, by the express wording of article 28 section III, importers and distributors of used tyres.
The mechanism
Article 19 section X makes the used tyre its own category of special-handling waste, with a Management Plan duty.
Who enforces
The state authorises integral management (art. 9 s. III). Fines up to 50,000 UMA (art. 112 s. V).
NOM-161-SEMARNAT-2011
Normative annex, headings IV and VIII (c)
Who it binds
Large generators above 10 tonnes per waste stream per year, plus federal and public transport.
The mechanism
«Waste tyres» appears twice in the list of wastes subject to a Management Plan. That threshold decides who is bound.
Who enforces
SEMARNAT sets the list; the states request additions and removals.
North and Central America
Government Agreement 164-2021, amended by 184-2023
Integral management of common solid waste, with circular-economy principles. No tyre-specific regime.
Integral Solid Waste Management Regulation · Agreement 1567-2010
Used tyres are classified as special waste. Collection and disposal fall on the municipalities.
National Plan for the Integral Management of Waste Tyres
A dedicated national tyre plan, aligned with the Integral Waste Management and Recycling Promotion Act.
No specific regime found
We found no national instrument dedicated to end-of-life tyres. The general solid waste framework applies.
Waste Tyre Regulation · Decree 33745-S (2007)
The generator hands the used tyre to the seller when replacing it. Enforced by the Health Ministry; MINAE drives EPR under the integral waste law.
Recycled-rubber asphalt bill — in process
1.3 million tyres a year are discarded, with an estimated 30% ending up loose in the environment. The bill was passed, objected to by the executive, and passed again with changes.
The Caribbean
No specific regime found
We found no national instrument dedicated to end-of-life tyres.
Law 225-20 on Integral Management and Co-processing of Solid Waste
Tyres are named as a priority waste. The law bans open dumps and mandates a transition to a circular economy.
No specific regime found
We found no national instrument dedicated to end-of-life tyres.
South America
Resolutions 523/2013 and 522/2016 · Law 25,626 (2002)
523/2013 sets guidelines but, being a ministerial resolution, does not bind the provinces. Law 25,626 does ban importing used tyres. The national ELT bill is still unpassed.
Law 755 on Integral Waste Management
Tyres appear among products whose use generates regulated waste, with no dedicated regime.
CONAMA Resolution 416 (30 September 2009)
A 1:1 ratio: for every new tyre sold into the replacement market, one unserviceable tyre must be properly disposed of. Applies to makers and importers of tyres over 2 kg. Annual declaration to IBAMA.
Law 20,920 · EPR Law, targets decree in force since 2023
Binding collection and recovery targets stepping up to 2030 — the decree reaches 90% collection. The Environment Superintendency inspects and fines.
Resolution 1326 of 2017
Selective Collection Systems. What must be collected is calculated on the average placed on the market over the two preceding years. ANLA approves and verifies.
Agreement MAATE-2022-131
Instructions for applying Extended Producer Responsibility to the integral management of end-of-life tyres.
Law 3956/2009 and Decree 7391/2017
ELTs are special solid waste. Whoever sells and fits the tyre must take back the old one, and the consumer must hand it over. Municipalities are responsible for collection and disposal. MADES enforces.
Supreme Decree 024-2021-MINAM · Special ELT Regime
The second Special Regime under Legislative Decree 1278. Requires differentiated ELT handling under extended producer responsibility.
Decree 358/015 (28 December 2015)
Manufacturers and importers must hold or join a master plan to take back tyres from consumers. Excludes those imported fitted to vehicles.
No specific regime found
We found no national instrument dedicated to end-of-life tyres.
Twenty countries, twenty different answers — and a single point of agreement: every one obliges somebody to prove where the tyre went, and none of them supplies the mechanism to prove it. The law says «demonstrate»; it does not say how. Six countries already have numeric targets and four have nothing yet, but the gap is identical from Tijuana to Ushuaia.
The raw material
Where the rubber in a tyre actually comes from
Before talking about recycling it, it helps to know what it is made of. A tyre is not «rubber»: it is a compound of between ten and twenty different materials, engineered specifically not to fall apart. That is exactly why it is so hard to process.
Plant origin
Natural rubber
Fossil origin
Synthetic rubber
The reinforcing filler
Carbon black and silica
What makes it hard to recycle
Sulphur and vulcanisation
The skeleton
Steel and textiles
And the rest
Oils, waxes and activators
What can be done with it
The six recovery routes
There is no single way to recover an end-of-life tyre, and they are not worth the same. Ordered from most to least value retained — which does not always match what is most profitable in Latin America today.
| Route | What it involves | Product | Where it ends up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retreading | The tread is replaced on a casing that is still sound. It retains the most value, because the tyre goes on being a tyre. | Retreaded tyre | Freight fleets, buses, aviation |
| Shredding and granulation | Mechanical size reduction at ambient temperature down to 0.5–4 mm particles, with steel and textile separated out. | Crumb rubber | Artificial turf, sports flooring, rubberised asphalt, moulded parts |
| Micronisation | Fine milling, sometimes cryogenic — using liquid nitrogen — for a cleaner, more uniform particle. The finer it is, the higher the price. | Rubber powder, graded by mesh | Modified asphalt, coatings, adhesives, shoe soles |
| Devulcanisation | Selectively breaks the sulphur bridges so the rubber can be processed again. Thermal, mechanical, chemical or ultrasonic. | Reclaimed rubber | Goes back into new rubber compounds |
| Pyrolysis | Thermal decomposition without oxygen. It breaks the polymer and separates its fractions. | Oil, recovered carbon black, steel, gas | See the next section |
| Energy recovery | The tyre’s calorific value is used as an alternative fuel. Tyre chip has a calorific value comparable to coal. | TDF · tyre derived fuel | Cement kilns, paper mills, steelworks |
Tyres are also used whole or coarsely shredded in civil engineering — retaining walls, lightweight embankments, artificial reefs — known as TDA (Tyre Derived Aggregate). It is the lowest value per tonne, but it absorbs large volumes and needs almost no transformation.
The route that raises the most questions
Pyrolysis, explained without the smoke
It is the technology people talk about most and the one surrounded by the most bad information. It is worth understanding properly before investing in it.
What it is. Heating the tyre to between 400 and 600 °C in the absence of oxygen. With no oxygen there is no combustion: the polymer does not burn, it breaks. Long chains split into smaller molecules, which separate into three streams plus the steel.
Typical yield, by weight
In favour
It recovers material, not just energy
Against
The quality of the solid decides everything
The question to ask
Who buys the output?
Permits
Not an ordinary plant
How the rest of the world handles it
The international map
Latin America is not inventing anything here: there are three proven models and a couple of dozen countries that have run them for twenty years. It is worth knowing which one resembles what is coming.
| Model | How it works | Who pays | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended producer responsibility | The law obliges manufacturers and importers to take care of the product at end of life. They group into a non-profit body that organises collection. | A visible fee when the new tyre is bought | Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, the Netherlands |
| Shared responsibility · free market | No central body. Every actor who touches the tyre answers for their leg of it and the market allocates the flows. | The generator, through a handling fee | United States |
| State-administered scheme | A public body collects a tax or levy and contracts collection and processing. | A tax on tyre sales | Several Canadian provinces, some Brazilian states |
Mexico currently operates a management-plan scheme derived from NOM-161-SEMARNAT-2011, closer to the first model but without a mandatory point-of-sale fee. Any future reform towards full EPR would radically change the size of the market.
Global coordination
WBCSD · Tire Industry Project
Europe
ETRMA
United States
USTMA
Spain
SIGNUS · TNU
Italy
Ecopneus
France
Aliapur
Netherlands
RecyBEM
Australia
Tyre Stewardship Australia
Europe, twenty years ahead
Europe by the numbers
When somebody asks whether this works, the answer is not an opinion: it is Europe having done it for twenty years.
The four with the longest track record
🇪🇸
SpainSIGNUS
Non-profit, funded by an eco-fee
🇮🇹
ItalyEcopneus
Operating since 2011
🇫🇷
FranceAliapur
Founded in 2003
🇳🇱
NetherlandsRecyBEM
Besluit beheer autobanden
What almost nobody points out about these systems: all four run on registration and traceability. RecyBEM has «registration of received old tyres» as a core function; SIGNUS and Ecopneus operate national tracking systems; Aliapur audits its collectors. The evidence layer is not an add-on to these systems — it is the machinery they run on. That is exactly what Latin America lacks, and the only thing ELTrack does.
The rest of the world
North America, Asia-Pacific and Africa
This closes the library: Latin America country by country, Europe by the numbers, and here the three continents that were missing.
North America
🇺🇸
United StatesNo federal law · 48 states with their own
🇨🇦
CanadaNo federal programme · province by province
Asia-Pacific
🇮🇳
IndiaMandatory EPR since 21 July 2022
🇯🇵
JapanVoluntary industry system · JATMA
🇰🇷
South KoreaEPR since 2000
🇦🇺
AustraliaVoluntary scheme authorised by the ACCC
🇨🇳
ChinaNo specific legislation found
Africa
🇿🇦
South AfricaEPR Regulations · R.1184, 5 November 2020
Across the rest of Africa and much of Southeast Asia we found no dedicated national tyre regime. We say «we found none», not «there is none»: the first is verifiable.
None of these systems resembles another in how it is funded: some are producer responsibility, others a state levy, one purely voluntary. Yet all of them converge on a single piece. The United States requires a manifest per shipment. India built a certificate market and attached five years’ imprisonment to inflating it. The Netherlands registers the tyre on receipt. Three continents, three funding models, one conclusion: somebody has to be able to prove where the tyre went.
SDGs · 2030 Agenda
Sustainable Development Goals: what we align to
The Sustainable Development Goals get quoted often and measured rarely. We do not measure environmental impact: we measure evidence. These are the four targets where an ELTrack figure is directly useful to whoever actually has to report.
Combat vector-borne diseases and reduce deaths from air pollution.
A tyre left in the open collects water and becomes a mosquito breeding site; burned in the open it releases dioxins and particulate matter. Both start in the same place: a dump nobody recorded.
The figure ELTrack produces
Illegal dumps reported, and how many of them were cleared.
Reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, paying special attention to municipal waste management.
End-of-life tyres are special-handling waste and managing them lands on the municipality. Today most cannot say how many tyres circulate in their territory, let alone where they end up.
The figure ELTrack produces
Tonnes managed per municipality, with a folio and a receipt from whoever took them.
Substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, recycling and reuse, and encourage companies to integrate sustainability information into their reporting.
A company can report that it recovered its waste. What it can almost never do is prove it with a document that survives an audit.
The figure ELTrack produces
A certificate per shipment: origin, weight, destination and the processor’s receipt.
Encourage effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships.
No single actor solves the tyre problem. It takes the municipality that collects, the private operator that processes, the authorised carrier and the citizen who says where the problem is.
The figure ELTrack produces
Actors connected in the network, and citizen reports turned into collections.
Guides by profile
Start with who you are
Every player arrives with different questions. These are the ones we are asked most, grouped by profile.
Public sector
I am a municipality
Private sector
I am a processor
Producers
I am a manufacturer or importer
Large generators
I am a generator: fleet, industry or mine
Social Sector
I am a citizen
Investors
I want to build a plant
Glossary
The sector's vocabulary, no waffle
Regulation moves. We follow it.
Sector analysis, regulatory changes and market prices. Free.
Join the network